Terrorizing World – "Enough is enough"

Time to ACT tough . Now !

Q&A: Militancy in Afghanistan and Pakistan

Posted by :) on July 8, 2009

For much of the last decade Nato forces in Afghanistan and Pakistani troops in the north-west of their country have been fighting Taliban and al-Qaeda militants.

Source – The BBC

So why is there conflict in the two countries and is there a link?

A US-led coalition spearheaded the invasion of Afghanistan in October 2001 because it said that the country was being used as a sanctuary by al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden following the 9/11 attacks in the US.

From the outset, it has sought the help of Pakistan in rooting out insurgents, determined that there should be no safe havens for militants.

When it became clear that neither bin Laden nor Taliban leader Mullah Omar had been killed or captured, the pressure on Pakistan to eject militants from its border areas simply increased.

Since then the Pakistani army has launched offensives against militant positions interspersed with controversial peace deals. The Americans in particular opposed these, arguing that they allowed the militants to re-group.

The latest such offensive began at the end of 2008, following the election of President Asif Ali Zardari. Pakistan is now pursuing militants across the north-west of the country.

Should the world be worried?

There is a near-universal consensus that the answer is a resounding yes.

The principal concern is the security of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons which it is feared could fall into Taliban or al-Qaeda hands.

Taliban members in north-western Pakistan

The Taliban have proved themselves to be formidable adversaries

Most commentators agree that the possibility of this happening is remote, but concern still runs high.

In April 2009 US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told a US Senate committee that while a lot of time was spent worrying about Iran getting nuclear weapons, Pakistan already had them.

Some feel the danger is being exaggerated in Washington in order to build support for the Obama administration’s “Af-Pak policy”.

But the BBC’s Mark Urban says that the real danger lies in subversion – one or more individuals working inside the system providing militants with nuclear materials or even an entire atomic weapon.

There are concerns that India may become involved in the conflict against militancy – especially in Pakistan – if there is a repeat of the November 2008 Mumbai attacks, which were blamed on extremists operating out of Pakistan.

Both India and the US suspect that radical madrassas in Pakistan are exporting militants around the world.

What’s being done to fight the militants?

Apart from the ongoing Pakistani army offensive in parts of the North West Frontier Province (NWFP) and the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Fata) the Americans have over the last few years used controversial drone attacks to hit militant targets in Pakistan from Afghanistan.

British soldier with an Afghan man in Kabul

Nato says it aims to help stabilise Afghanistan

These have generated much concern because in many cases civilians have been killed in these attacks.

President Obama has also announced a “troop surge” in Afghanistan of around 21,000 additional US troops, while considering a further deployment of 10,000 more to add to around 70,000 foreign troops who are currently based there.

The US military has stressed that if the war in Afghanistan is to be won, the development battle is almost as important as the military conflict.

That is why the West has poured billions of dollars into north-west Pakistan and into Afghanistan for the construction of schools, hospitals and community centres.

How serious is Pakistan in defeating the Taliban?

Pakistan’s government says that it is serious about tackling the Taliban. The country’s powerful military is currently shoulder-to-shoulder with the government on this issue, especially when it comes to targeting the leader of the Pakistani Taliban, Baitullah Mehsud.

Baitullah Mehsud

It is Mehsud’s fighters who are said to be behind the intensified attacks on military installations and personnel.

But doubts remain over the army’s willingness to fight those Taliban involved in cross-border attacks in Afghanistan. Indeed, some elements are thought to supportive those militants focusing on Afghanistan.

They see seen as a useful counterweight to what the army says is the growing influence of perennial rival India in Central Asia.

So can Pakistan beat the militants?

At the moment that is difficult to say. A lot depends on whether President Zardari can muster the political will to do so amid rising military and civilian casualties.

So far the militants appear to have been ejected from most of NWFP – including the Swat valley but they still entrenched in tribal areas. In North and South Waziristan for example – the area widely believed to be the hiding place of Osama Bin Laden – the army has yet to begin a full-scale offensive.

Even if Pakistan does remove the militants from their strongholds in the Fata, the terrain there is difficult and ideally suited to guerrilla warfare. No-one is expecting either the Taliban or al-Qaeda to disappear overnight.

What is the human cost in both countries?

The human cost of the war in both countries has been immense.

In Pakistan it is estimated that more than two million people have been displaced by the latest fighting.

In Afghanistan, the UN says that the number of civilians killed rose by 39% in 2008. It said that militants were to blame for 55% of the 2,118 civilian deaths, while US, Nato and Afghan forces were responsible for 39%.

Who is going to win overall?

In the short term, neither side in either country, are likely to claim victory.

British troops in Helmand

Helmand is the ‘largest single source of opium’ in Afghanistan

Recent analysis of where things stand in Afghanistan was provided in June 2009 by Nato’s outgoing supreme commander, Gen John Craddock.

He said that a lack of troops is putting severe constraints on its military operations in Afghanistan and that there was in effect a stalemate in the south and east of the country, the areas worst affected by the insurgency.

Nato commanders hope that President Obama’s surge will rectify this, so more heavy fighting can be expected in Afghanistan in the months ahead.

In Pakistan, the army is also pushing back the militants who are now confined to their heartlands on the border with Afghanistan.

But no-one expects them to be easily defeated in their mountainous homeland.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: